Offensive inanity in the name of evolutionary psychology
This closes (for now) the series of posts on the IQ fallacy. There is more here and here if you are interested in the issue, which started with intelligence testing (among other things) and then took that awkward and despicable turn towards measuring sexual attractiveness.
The background lesson is that valid statistical analysis is useful not just to sort out who is right and who is wrong: it would have avoided the problem entirely in the first place.
Disclaimer: I know people in both institutions, although I do not know the main wrongdoer in the controversy.